featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Sequestration Setbacks – Lessons from the case of Vlahos v Vlahos

By David Burley a Law Clerk of Matthews Folbigg Lawyers in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Roderick Group Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Vlahos v Vlahos [2024] FedCFamC2G 1439 (“Vlahos v Vlahos”) is the latest case in which the court has reinforced the importance of paying close attention to detail when applying for a sequestration order. The case dealt with an application for the review of a sequestration order made against the estate of Mr Vlahos. The pivotal issue was whether Mr Vlahos had been properly served with a bankruptcy notice, an act required under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Mr Vlahos contended that he had not been properly served due to an incorrect postcode being used in the address (even though he himself had provided that same post code). The implications of this argument and the subsequent decision carry significant consequences for creditors in serving bankruptcy notices and proceeding with creditors petitions, and also for trustees in bankruptcy appointed under sequestration orders which might be liable to be set aside. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Signed, Sealed….But Was it Really Delivered? The Perils of Serving Legal Documents by Prepaid Post

By David Burley a Law Clerk of Matthews Folbigg Lawyers in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

In the recent case of Roderick Group Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Vlahos v Vlahos [2024] FedCFamC2G 1439 (“Vlahos v Vlahos”), the Court was tasked with deciding whether a bankruptcy notice sent by post, but which included an incorrect postcode in the address, had nevertheless been validly served. The case highlights the risks associated with relying on non-personal service methods such as service by post, where minor errors can lead to substantial legal consequences. The judgment underscores the importance of accuracy in serving documents and the benefits for creditors who opt for personal service (especially insofar as time and costs are concerned). [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

A Garnish on Top?

Recovering monies from debtors can be a lengthy, exhausting and costly exercise. Most people would think that once a garnishee order has been issued by the court then the debt would be quickly recovered, however it is not uncommon that once executed, funds in an account are no longer available. In circumstances such as this often clients will ask the question, what happens next in relation to my garnishee order?

What is a Garnishee Order?

A Garnishee Order is an order of the Court which allows a judgment creditor to recover or ‘garnish’ a third party in respect of an amount owing to the judgment debtor. The third party can include a bank, an employer, a purchaser of the debtor’s property, or any other entity/individual that holds money on behalf of, or owes money to the debtor. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Unpaid School Fees – How To Avoid And Handle Debt Collection In Relation To Tuition

When school fees go unpaid, it puts education providers in a tough position. On the one hand, there is a student relying on their institution for fundamental learning. On the other, without debt collection the financial viability of running the school is put at risk. It is therefore important to implement a plan so that debt collection procedures are avoided, or where absolutely necessary, are as painless as possible. This involves contemplating debt collection before students enrol, when tuition is overdue, and when debt collection proceedings become inevitable. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

When Will a Court Replace a Trustee of a Bankrupt Estate?

Recently, the Federal Court of Australia (Justice Perry) in Yan v Spyrakis (Trustee), in the matter of the bankrupt estate of Liu [2024] FCA 768 considered when a Court may make an order to replace a trustee of a bankrupt estate under section 90-15 of Schedule 2 to the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Schedule”).

Facts

In December 2017, Mr Yan loaned $10 million to Mr Liu and GR Capital. In November 2021, Mr Liu became bankrupt, and Mr Spyrakis (“the Trustee”) was appointed as his trustee in bankruptcy. In March 2022, the Trustee published a report to the creditors of the bankrupt estate of Mr Liu (“the Estate”) stating approximately $64 million was owed to creditors and that Mr Yan, Ruifa Wang, and Yuqing Liu and Xingfeng Australia International Investment Pty Ltd (“Xingfeng”), were the unsecured creditors owed the largest debts. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

When will courts pull the plug? Understanding the termination of a Deed of Company Arrangement under section 445D(1)(g) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

When will a Court terminate a Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) for ‘some other reason’ under section 445D(1)(g) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (”the Act”)? In two recent cases, two separate courts have shed light on whether, and when, ‘public interest’ serves as a compelling reason to terminate a DOCA.

Yan v The Won Capital Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 758

Facts

In December 2017, Mr Yan loaned $10 million to GR Capital. In October 2018, GR Capital appointed administrators who reported to creditors the preliminary view that GR Capital had been insolvent since at least December 2017. Despite the administrators’ recommendations against the DOCA, creditors resolved on 30 January 2019 that GR Capital execute a holding DOCA allowing time to complete a property development before creditors could take action against GR Capital. Mr Yan commenced proceedings seeking termination of the DOCA under section 445D(1) of the Act to allow a liquidator to investigate insolvent trading claims. Mr Yan offered to provide funding to the liquidator for the investigations. As the limitation period on any insolvent trading claim was about to expire, it became urgent whether the DOCA was to be terminated and a liquidator appointed. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

DEBT COLLECTOR OR DEBT COLLECTION LAWYER? WHICH IS BEST FOR DEBT COLLECTION?

Debt collection is difficult at the best of times. To make debt collection easier, it is natural to turn to debt collectors or debt collection lawyers to assist. But who is best placed to deal with your specific situation? To answer this, it is worth thinking about the nature of the relationship you have with the debtor.

The debt collection relationship between debtor and creditor:

Debt collection can arise in all manner of situations. It can happen when a trusted and valuable commercial associate falls on hard times, when an opportunistic borrower thinks they can get away with not paying their bills, or for countless other reasons. The nature of the debtor/creditor relationship can be integral to the approach. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Collecting Money: which court should I pick?

By Ewurama Appiah a Law Clerk at Matthews Folbigg in the Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group

Do you have a debt to collect and are you unsure in which court to file your claim? Read on to find out more information on the steps you should take to ensure you maximise your ability to recover that debt!

Debt recovery through the courts is largely regulated by state and territory law and the procedural rules of the courts. Recovery of debts may include the repossession of assets or other legal enforcement of security interests. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Debt Recovery for Small to Medium Businesses

Debt recovery – All small/medium business owners have been here before – you have taken the time and care to provide your quality goods or services to a customer, and when it comes time for them to pay, you get radio silence or a refusal to pay. Your phone calls, texts and emails with payment reminders and attempts to follow up have been unsuccessful, and now, weeks or months later, you are exhausted and still have a large unpaid invoice, plus all the time and money you have spent on debt collection services. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

Security for Costs Order

Security for Costs: How to not get dragged down by the impecunious Plaintiff

A successful defendant can often be left with a significant legal bill despite a court ordering the plaintiff to pay their costs of the proceeding – winning the battle but losing the war.

Imagine you find yourself as a defendant in proceedings that you never saw coming and  which should ultimately never have happened. The plaintiff’s claims may lack merit and have very low prospects of success, but they commenced proceedings against you anyway in a desperate attempt to recover money that they lost as a consequence of their own actions. After all of the hours of stress, sleepless nights, phone calls, meetings, and thousands of dollars of legal fees, you and your legal team emerge from litigation victorious, with the plaintiff to pay your costs of the proceeding – only to find out, the plaintiff has no money, no assets and is unable to pay your legal fees. [...]  READ MORE →

featured-image-posts-800w
No Comments

AICM Risk Report 2023

Australian Institute of Credit Management – Risk Report 2023

Credit professionals play a crucial role in any business, ensuring that both the risks of
defaulting on contractual obligations are managed, and that payment of goods or services
are received in a timely manner.

The Australian Institute of Credit Management (AICM) is a member body for commercial and
consumer management professionals formed with the goal of helping their members,
partners, government, other related bodies and the business community to succeed in
credit-related matters.

The AICM has released their Risk Report 2023 (Report) which provides a succinct and
useful insight on how recent and future economic conditions are impacting credit
professional’s abilities to manage risk and ensure a business is paid promptly for their
services. The Report draws on survey results collected from AICM members and Certified
Credit Executives. [...]  READ MORE →

Law and Justice , Legality concept, Judge Gavel, Law book and Scales of Justice on a black wooden background, law library concept.
No Comments

Dotting the I’s, and crossing the T’s – the perils of creditors statutory demands

By Jeffrey Brown a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

The slightest slip of the pen can lead to disastrous consequences when you are dealing with creditors statutory demands, as a recent Supreme Court case demonstrates.

VO Group Australia Pty Limited (“VO”) was making an application to set aside a statutory demand that had been issued on it by Watpac Construction Pty Limited (“Watpac”).  Watpac in turn alleged that the application was made outside the 21 day time limit for making such an application and was invalid. [...]  READ MORE →