No Comments

Collecting Money: Which court should I pick?

By Bonnie McMahon an Associate of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group

When collecting money from a debtor in NSW, it is important to ensure that you are collecting money in the right court.

  • Collecting money under $20,000 – When collecting money which is under $20,000, debt collection proceedings should be commenced in the Small Claims Division of the Local Court of NSW.
  • Collecting money over $20,000 but under $100,000 – When collecting money which is over $20,000 but under $100,000, debt collection proceedings should be commenced in the General Division of the Local Court of NSW. However, there are some circumstances where collecting money up to $120,000 can be done in the Local Court, although you will normally need the consent of the debtor.
  • Collecting money over $100,000 but under $750,000 – When collecting money which is over $100,000 but under $750,000, debt collection proceedings should be commenced in the District Court of NSW. However, like the Local Court, the District Court can hear debt collection matters up to $1,125,000, provided no party objects to the matter being heard in the District Court.
  • Collecting money over $750,000 – When collecting money over $750,000, debt recovery proceedings should generally be commenced in the Supreme Court of NSW.

What happens if you are collecting money by debt collection proceedings in the wrong court?

If you are collecting money in the Supreme Court and you obtain a judgment for less than $500,000, you may not be able to recover costs from the debtor, unless the Supreme Court is satisfied that commencing debt collection proceedings in the Supreme Court was warranted. [...]  READ MORE →

No Comments

COVID-19: Will my hearing go ahead? – Part 3

By Andrew Hack, Solicitor, and Stephen Mullette, Principal, of Matthews Folbigg Lawyers, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

This is part 3 of our series on what will constitute valid grounds for an adjournment of a pending hearing, due to COVID-19 and the global coronavirus pandemic.

In Talent v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy & Anor (No 5) [2020] ACTSC 64 the Plaintiff sought an adjournment of the trial hearing, arguing that he was an ‘at risk’ person because he suffered from leukaemia. Doctors had recommended that he remain isolated. [...]  READ MORE →

No Comments

COVID-19: Will my hearing go ahead? – Part 2

By Andrew Hack, Solicitor, and Stephen Mullette, Principal, of Matthews Folbigg Lawyers, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

We are continuing our series on whether a global pandemic will allow (or force) an adjournment of pending court proceedings.

In Kahil v R [2020] NSWCCA 56 Senior Counsel for the accused sought leave to withdraw from appearing for a co-accused on the 7th day of an estimated 3 week criminal trial. This was because he was aged 69, had a “compromised immune system” and was concerned about his exposure to one of the co-accused (his client) who he described as “fluey”. Counsel had tried to be tested for the COVID-19 coronavirus over the weekend and had been refused because “he did not qualify for a test”. [...]  READ MORE →

No Comments

Enforcing Environmental Laws in the Land and Environment Court

The Land and Environment Court operates in a specialist jurisdiction dealing with cases that relate to mining, planning, the environment, local government and development. The Land and Environment Court was established by legislation and can only deal with matters that fall within its jurisdiction.

Civil Enforcement

Most environmental proceedings within NSW can be enforced through civil proceedings in the courts, particularly the Land and Environment Court where there is an alleged breach of an environmental law.

Civil action in the courts can be used to obtain court orders to prevent environmental harm from occurring which is beneficial as often in criminal proceedings, legal action is reactive and taken after harm has already been caused. For example an injunction can be sought in the Land and Environment Court to prevent an incident that would cause environmental harm. [...]  READ MORE →

No Comments

Importance of Careful Drafting for Council Contracts

Background

Case Note: Port Macquarie-Hastings Council v Diveva Pty Limited [2017] NSWCA 97

In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal of NSW made a determination which is particularly instructive for Councils when undertaking any tender process. The decision highlights the importance of carefully drafting contracts and the need to ensure that sufficient information is provided to potential tenderers during the tender process.

In 2011, Diveva Pty Limited (Diveva) successfully entered into a contract with Council to supply and lay asphalt around Council’s local government area. The contract had a simple “option” clause which merely stated that the period of the agreement was to be two years “with a future twelve (12) month option available”. [...]  READ MORE →